On 2001-04-16 00:49:55 +0000, Karim Yaghmour wrote: > > May I point out that "should be" is different from "can be" and I'm > afraid you'll find it hard to reach the 0.1% mark unless you resort to > self-modifying code. Huh? On modern CPU's, self-modifying code is a huge performance killer. Which is good, because it's also a nightmare to maintain. I think this, along with the bitmask idea, can be safely sent to /dev/null. Certainly nobody is going to stop anyone who wants to play around with performance tweaks like this, but I hate to see anyone waste a lot of time on techniques that won't work. :( Shane _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Apr 16 2001 - 03:05:41 PDT