>> Perhaps the think is the wrong way around. Maybe the KERNEL should >> give the MODULE patch points when the module is initialized and makes >> one specific call (e.g. security_inform_me()) returning a table of >> pointers to places where you need to poke addresses to a list of hooks. > What's wrong with the currently proposed method? It is specifically > what Linus said he would like to see. Nothing is *wrong* with the currently proposed method, but I think there're other methods which should be discussed and considered. Linus is a GENIUS and a GOD, but even the Goddess relies on US to do the thinking. Humbly, J. Melvin Jones |>------------------------------------------------------ || J. MELVIN JONES jmjonesat_private |>------------------------------------------------------ || Microcomputer Systems Consultant || Software Developer || Web Site Design, Hosting, and Administration || Network and Systems Administration |>------------------------------------------------------ || http://www.jmjones.com/ |>------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Apr 19 2001 - 11:36:48 PDT