On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 12:34:16PM +0200, Amon Ott wrote: > Hello Greg and all others, > > good work so far! thanks. > For some calls, I would appreciate more parameters (patch order): > - ptrace: request, pid Chris is going to work on this. > - load_elf_binary: rather make general solution for all exec types, with extra > security_ops, parameter file I agree. Haven't gotten to this yet. > - permission: is this meant for Linux DAC compatibility module only? I'd prefer > so. Permission is needed for capabilities too. Others might find it very useful as it is called all over the place in the vfs code :) > - sys_read, sys_write etc.: Use read/write ops, parameter file Hm, will add it. I haven't looked at the file_ops yet, that's next on the list for me. > - umount is missing, param kname or device Added. > - mount: all params Added. > - delete_module: module name (so we can protect ourselves) Added (along with parameters for init_module and create_module) > - send_file: use read/write ops Good catch. Will add it. > Clean function calls for me too, please - one level less to check, if something > goes wrong. Glad to see I'm not alone here :) Thanks a lot for your comments. greg k-h -- greg@(kroah|wirex).com http://immunix.org/~greg _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Apr 19 2001 - 11:38:21 PDT