On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 15:52:57 EDT, jmjonesat_private said: > Only thing is, I'm not sure this would involve anything in the kernel > hooks area, only in a "quasi-standard" for the modules, which may be > getting out of our arena here? What would need to go into the hooks? Umm.. Only thing I can think of is a rule that a specific LSM that doesn't want to use lsm_errno needs to set a basic sucess/fail, and whatever magic is needed to set lsm_errno (which would be similar to the errno setting, I would think?) Would Linus buy into that? ;) /Valdis
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Apr 23 2001 - 13:13:28 PDT