On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 11:44:46PM +0000, David Wagner wrote: > Therefore, I propose that this be left up to individual modules to > provide, or at least, that policy modules be free to do nothing whatsoever > to support lsm_perror. I agree with the "allow individual modules to provide" statement. Remember, we aren't tying lsm interface to any userspace interface. That's up to the specific lsm module. greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Apr 23 2001 - 17:07:07 PDT