On Mon, 7 May 2001, Chris Wright wrote: > * jmjonesat_private (jmjonesat_private) wrote: > > > > Left the suggested default at "N", but will set it up both ways. > > Was mostly looking at "total not" vs. "total without". Good thinking. > > Capabilities is currently integrated with the kernel. So the lsm patch with > just the dummy interface that gratuitously returns yes is not exactly an apples > to apples test with standard (non-lsm) capabilities-enabled kernel. I agree > with Greg, it'd be interesting to see what the results look like with the > capabilities module loaded. I've had no problem running the capability_plug > as a module (let me know if i can help you here). > > Thanks for the first set of benchmarks! > -chris > > _______________________________________________ > linux-security-module mailing list > linux-security-moduleat_private > http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module > Work in progress. Will recompile all ways to CONFIG_SECURITY... m Interesting results are the point. J. Melvin Jones |>------------------------------------------------------ || J. MELVIN JONES jmjonesat_private |>------------------------------------------------------ || Microcomputer Systems Consultant || Software Developer || Web Site Design, Hosting, and Administration || Network and Systems Administration |>------------------------------------------------------ || http://www.jmjones.com/ |>------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 07 2001 - 16:57:26 PDT