Re: 2001-05-27 patch against 2.4.5

From: Valdis.Kletnieksat_private
Date: Wed May 30 2001 - 20:48:44 PDT

  • Next message: Chris Lundberg: "Re: sys_setpriority error"

    On Wed, 30 May 2001 13:06:57 PDT, Greg KH said:
    > On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 01:46:21PM -0700, Crispin Cowan wrote:
    > > 
    > > In LSM land: I can imagine someone wanting to make a LSM module that does
    > > essentially what VMWare does.  Anyone from VMWare, Plex86, or User Mode Linux
    > > on this list care to comment?
    > Why would you have to make a LSM module to do this?  UML (User Mode
    > Linux) works just fine today without having to do all of the hooks that
    > LSM requires.  It "just" runs as a user task like VMWare does.
    UML is restricted to a user mode *LINUX*.
    IBM's CP/67 (which became VM) was designed for testing OS/MVT, and I've
    personally used VM to run OS/VS1 and MUSIC images.
    I do believe VMWARE will run a Microsoft operating system - that's a big
    market differentiation from UML - and probably requires different kernel
    linux-security-module mailing list

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed May 30 2001 - 20:49:38 PDT