Re: sys_setpriority error

From: Titus D. Winters (titusat_private)
Date: Thu May 31 2001 - 11:33:44 PDT

  • Next message: Chris Lundberg: "2.4.5 troubles"

    > What's wrong with making capability_plug THE dummy module?  It could be
    > replaced upon module registration, and it would *install* the kernel into
    > the same state as if the LSM patch was not applied.  Then the problem
    > would be in one code, and verification that "with dummy installed it's
    > exactly the same as the WITHOUT LSM module" would be possible.
    Yeah, I like that idea.  And to make the embedded folk happy, make it a
    compile option as to whether the default is capabilities or return-0
    dummies.  It certainly _is_ more work for those that are writing modules,
    but if we get stackability working nicely and elegantly then it shouldn't
    be too bad, and it'll be far more robust.
    linux-security-module mailing list

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu May 31 2001 - 11:34:24 PDT