Re: Some New Hooks

Previous message: Jesse Pollard: "Re: permissive vs. restrictive issue and solutions..."
In reply to: Chris Wright: "Re: Some New Hooks"
Next in thread: Chris Wright: "Re: Some New Hooks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

sdsat_private

On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Chris Wright wrote:

> The init funcition can leave your sys_calls registered even if the
> register_security call fails.  Is that intentional?  Simlarly, the exit
> function sets the sys_calls to NULL.  Shouldn't they be sys_ni_syscall
> instead?

Actually, I'll have to take the blame for these errors in the
SELinux module.  Yes, you are correct that these are errors.

--
Stephen D. Smalley, NAI Labs
ssmalleyat_private

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module