Re: permissive vs. restrictive issue and solutions...

Previous message: sarnoldat_private: "Re: module's use of security_ops"
In reply to: Stephen Smalley: "Re: permissive vs. restrictive issue and solutions..."
Next in thread: Stephen Smalley: "Re: permissive vs. restrictive issue and solutions..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

dawat_private

Stephen Smalley  wrote:
>  no_nice = security_ops->task_ops->setnice(p, niceval);
>  if (no_nice) {
>     error = no_nice;
>     continue;
>  }
>  if (p->uid != current->euid &&
>      p->uid != current->uid && !capable(CAP_SYS_NICE))
>      error = -EPERM;
>      continue;
>  }

Looks great!  Speaking personally, I love it.
Does it solve everyone else's problems, too?

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module