Re: Another hook

From: jmjonesat_private
Date: Thu Jun 14 2001 - 15:56:19 PDT

  • Next message: Titus D. Winters: "Re: Another hook"

    On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Titus D. Winters wrote:
    
    > Can I get a feel for the idea of having a hook that will govern letting a
    > module be detected?  I can imagine there are some securiyt modules (mine
    > for example) that would rather not broadcast their existence via someone
    > running lsmod.  I think I know where to add it already.
    > 
    > -Titus
    > 
    
    
    Detect or Identify?
    
    There are ways in the old/existing interface to deterimine of 
    a module (any module) is installed.
    
    register_security(*pointer);
    
    returns success if security_ops is dummy and pointer is not (with a few 
    minor validation checks.)
    
    J. Melvin Jones
    
    
    |>------------------------------------------------------
    ||  J. MELVIN JONES            jmjonesat_private 
    |>------------------------------------------------------
    ||  Microcomputer Systems Consultant  
    ||  Software Developer
    ||  Web Site Design, Hosting, and Administration
    ||  Network and Systems Administration
    |>------------------------------------------------------
    ||  http://www.jmjones.com/
    |>------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jun 14 2001 - 15:58:23 PDT