Re: Security hooks, "standard linux security" & embedded use

Previous message: jmjonesat_private: "Toward Documentation: LSMEXAMPLE.C version 0.5"
Next in thread: Crispin Cowan: "Re: Security hooks, &quot;standard linux security&quot; &amp; embedded use"
Reply: Crispin Cowan: "Re: Security hooks, &quot;standard linux security&quot; &amp; embedded use"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

gregat_private

LA Walsh wrote:
> 
> Dear Linus et al.,
> 
>         Sorry for the 'form' letter instead of individual names, but I
> didn't want to have to send this out separately to every kernel developer
> I know on LKML.
> 
>         I am asking for your input on the concept of moving the standard
> Linux security checks into a "Linux Security Module".

<snip>

Hm, who did you send this all out to?  Are you going to summarize the
responses and sent them to the lsm mailing list?

thanks,

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module