Greg KH wrote: > Hm, in looking at the code, and the recent proposals, it seems that our > existing TODO list is pretty small: > > - add socket operations > > Is there any outstanding issues that people have with the current patch > that need to be addressed? Is there anyone with a security module > project that needs additional hooks in the current patch to get their > code to work properly? I consider the "path name vs. inode" question to be unresolved. Chris is looking into the various proposals to see how well they work, and what kind of performance penalty they impose. He is hitting problems, which may or may not be solvable. Pending results, the name based hooks may need to come back. Crispin -- Crispin Cowan, Ph.D. Chief Scientist, WireX Communications, Inc. http://wirex.com Security Hardened Linux Distribution: http://immunix.org Available for purchase: http://wirex.com/Products/Immunix/purchase.html _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jul 13 2001 - 12:04:25 PDT