On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 12:02:33PM -0700, Crispin Cowan wrote: > > I consider the "path name vs. inode" question to be unresolved. Chris is > looking into the various proposals to see how well they work, and what > kind of performance penalty they impose. He is hitting problems, which > may or may not be solvable. Pending results, the name based hooks may > need to come back. What is the issue? Do you feel that the call to file_ops->alloc_security(f) comes to late to determine which path this file came from? Or is matching up files to inodes to difficult? greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jul 13 2001 - 13:20:23 PDT