Re: Changes to LSM phase 1 for audit.

Previous message: richard offer: "Re: Changes to LSM phase 1 for audit."
In reply to: richard offer: "Changes to LSM phase 1 for audit."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

offerat_private

A small oops crept into the patch as released earlier today that Stephen
picked up on.

We hadn't implemented his comment regarding the relocation of the
free_security hook that he'd made against our first ever patch (aka
bumper-3), in that we'd moved the free call to a position more suitable for
us, this broke SELinux's assumptions.

These few lines correct that error, returning the code back to how Stephen
wanted it.

This patch should be applied after this mornings patch.


Sorry for missing this.


richard.


===== kernel/exit.c 1.8 vs edited =====

--- 1.8/kernel/exit.c   Tue Jul 17 16:39:12 2001
+++ edited/kernel/exit.c        Tue Jul 17 16:39:56 2001
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
                task_unlock(p);
 #endif
                atomic_dec(&p->user->processes);
+               security_ops->task_ops->free_security(p);
                free_uid(p->user);
                unhash_process(p);
 
@@ -438,7 +439,6 @@
 #ifdef CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT
        acct_process(code);
 #endif
-       security_ops->task_ops->free_security(tsk);
        __exit_mm(tsk);
 
        lock_kernel();



_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
