On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 06:58:18PM -0700, Crispin Cowan wrote: > > Your private e-mail seemed to mis-understand the SubDomain security model. > Yes, the absolute path name is the be-al and end-all that we need. What you > outlined is an appropriate model for an ACL (access control list) model, but > SubDomain is the dual of that. I'm not going to continue the SubDomain specific discussion on this list, as it's off-topic. If you find that you need to add another hook to the current LSM interface to support your security module project, please present it and everyone can evaluate it, like any other security module project can (and should) do. thanks, greg k-h (who thought he understood the SubDomain security model, as his name was on parts of the source...) _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jul 19 2001 - 09:14:33 PDT