On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 03:46:38PM -0700, richard offer wrote: > > We are really keen to get the API changed as soon as possible so that we > can start working on the rest of the audit code ready for phase 2. > > What does the rest of the list feel we need to do to have the patch > accepted ? Um, what about splitting the patch up into 3 pieces as I suggested, as it does 3 different things? And I recommend adding the fd to the functions as part of "phase 2", not to be added right now. We don't want _anything_ in the LSM patch that is not needed _right now_ or odds are it will be rejected. I will not defend a lsm patch to anyone that contains portions that "will be used in the future." As someone else on this list said, interfaces in Linux change, and that's a good thing. When we push for audit, if it is decided to, _then_ we add those changes to the patch. MHO of course :) greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jul 20 2001 - 15:57:23 PDT