Re: Names vs. Inodes

Previous message: Casey Schaufler: "Re: State of Audit Proposal ?"
In reply to: jmjonesat_private: "Re: Names vs. Inodes"
Next in thread: jmjonesat_private: "Re: Names vs. Inodes"
Reply: jmjonesat_private: "Re: Names vs. Inodes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

sarnoldat_private

On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 03:28:57PM -0400, jmjonesat_private wrote:
[Crispin's SubDomain description.]

> This would seem to me to be an excellent description of a "permissive"
> policy.

Absolultely not. SubDomain *never* grants access to a file that the DAC
checks deny.

:)

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module