Seth Arnold wrote: >I *think* we have reached the consensus on the file descriptor issue >that though many of us don't see the inherent value, it doesn't cost too >much more to pass it along as information where it is available. I'll agree with that. Speaking as someone who has objected on grounds that 'I don't see why it's needed', I won't object further if other LSM developers think it is truly useful, which it sounds like is indeed the case. _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jul 24 2001 - 01:53:22 PDT