Re: The Demise of Simple Assurance?

From: Shane Kerr (shane@time-travellers.org)
Date: Wed Aug 01 2001 - 01:44:32 PDT

  • Next message: richard offer: "Re: The Demise of Simple Assurance?"

    On 2001-07-31 20:25:12 -0700, Crispin Cowan wrote:
    > Valdis.Kletnieksat_private wrote:
    > 
    > > On Tue, 31 Jul 2001 19:12:20 PDT, Crispin Cowan said:
    > > > [moving kernel's DAC logic to a module is hopeless]
    > >
    > > Is it something that we should at least get onto people's radar as a
    > > possible thing for a 2.7 kernel project?  I suspect much of it is
    > > intertwined due to "just grew" software dynamics.
    > 
    > I agree that it "just grew."  That's what makes it hard to reverse.
    
    Perhaps it would be good to provide a LSM-friendly methodology for
    future kernel code (and any maintainer who wishes to patch their
    respective portions of the current codebase)?
    
    Shane
    
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Aug 01 2001 - 06:36:30 PDT