Re: The Demise of Simple Assurance?

From: Valdis.Kletnieksat_private
Date: Wed Aug 01 2001 - 09:14:42 PDT

  • Next message: Greg KH: "2001_08_01 patch against 2.4.7" 

    On Wed, 01 Aug 2001 10:44:32 +0200, Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org>  said:
> Perhaps it would be good to provide a LSM-friendly methodology for
> future kernel code (and any maintainer who wishes to patch their
> respective portions of the current codebase)?

On Wed, 01 Aug 2001 07:14:33 -0700, richard offer <offerat_private> said:
> However, taking one step back, its probably something that somebody should
> be thinking about for the Linux 3.0 timeframe.

Exactly. ;)
-- 
				Valdis Kletnieks
				Operating Systems Analyst
				Virginia Tech
    _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Aug 01 2001 - 18:18:34 PDT