This may not be portable, but for debugging/testing/evaluating on Intel CPUs isn't it possible to use a SYSEXIT trap to implement an arbitrary system call list? If a test module initialized the trap it would be possible to implement any kernel transitions, as long as it were implemented in the same way as the default system calls. Then, after testing/debugging, the new system calls could be added to the standard list with a more permanent assignment. I admit to a limited knowlege here, but when I worked on embeded systems this technique was used so as to not affect the existing system. (This might be more work than it's worth, but a thought..) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jesse I Pollard, II Email: pollardat_private Any opinions expressed are solely my own. _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Aug 10 2001 - 07:30:47 PDT