Greg KH wrote: > No we don't need any such "uniform standard". > > You need a standard for _your_ user applications to determine if _your_ > security module is currently loaded. And since you wrote both of them, > and control both of them, you're set. Actually, I would like to offer multiple policies to my customers, perhaps even SELinux as well as CAPP (C2) and LSPP (B1) to augment the "traditional" policy. I want one version of ls, login (PAM modules, actually), su, ps, etc which enforce and/or report based on the policy installed. Yes, I can do that in my own, special private copy of ls.c, but I'd rather share it with the world. For my own evil purposes, of course. -- Casey Schaufler Manager, Trust Technology, SGI caseyat_private voice: 650.933.1634 casey_pat_private Pager: 888.220.0607 _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Aug 14 2001 - 10:16:47 PDT