On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, Crispin Cowan wrote: > > In the red corner we have people who think it should be done via /proc > > Greg, Jesse, > > As already commented, Greg's view is actually "not syscalls", and he suggests > /proc and list_modules as alternatives. Add me to this column. > > > > In the green corner we have those that think its un-needed > > J. Melvin > > I'd be surprised if JMJ doesn't think an identification method is needed. Please move me near the red corner. I *do* believe it is necessary, I just don't think it's necessary to implement it explicitly in the LSM interface... but think it is better left to the module/application designer to develop a product specific means. If a common mechanism IS developed, I don't think it should be in the syscall. > > Crispin > > -- > Crispin Cowan, Ph.D. > Chief Scientist, WireX Communications, Inc. http://wirex.com > Security Hardened Linux Distribution: http://immunix.org > Available for purchase: http://wirex.com/Products/Immunix/purchase.html > J. Melvin Jones |>------------------------------------------------------ || J. MELVIN JONES jmjonesat_private |>------------------------------------------------------ || Microcomputer Systems Consultant || Software Developer || Web Site Design, Hosting, and Administration || Network and Systems Administration |>------------------------------------------------------ || http://www.jmjones.com/ |>------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Aug 14 2001 - 09:54:38 PDT