* Greg KH (gregat_private) wrote: > On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 11:55:55AM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote: > > > > 1. POSIX ACLs > > But isn't there a group already working on getting these (or something > like them) into the kernel? And the current kernel code would have to > change a bit to support them. Then, when that code is in, I see no > reason why the LSM patch would not be changed to handle them. > > Or is the ACL group looking at using the LSM patch to achieve their > goals? from my take of monitoring their project we would use their work (and augment lsm accordingly), rather than them using our work. -chris _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Sep 05 2001 - 16:31:00 PDT