On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 08:17:19PM -0700, Crispin Cowan wrote: > Actually yes, I vehemently object to this change. Why? Don't you think that security modules that are loaded by your kernel should be open source? > The final determination is up to Linus, naturally, but I assumed all > along that licensing issues for LSM would be the same as they are for > the existing Linux loadble module and device driver interface. Actually they are determined by the authors of the code, just like the rest of the kernel is. A number of other subsystems are moving to just this same kind of licensing model (IDE for instance) for 2.5. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Sep 23 2001 - 20:30:42 PDT