Greg KH wrote: >I've attached the patch that I came up with below (and accidentally >committed it to the tree, sorry, I didn't mean to do that without some >discussion first, it can be backed out or changed.) The wording isn't >the best, but I think it gets the idea across. Does anyone have any >better wording they can think of for this? > >Or does anyone object to this change? > Actually yes, I vehemently object to this change. The final determination is up to Linus, naturally, but I assumed all along that licensing issues for LSM would be the same as they are for the existing Linux loadble module and device driver interface. Crispin -- Crispin Cowan, Ph.D. Chief Scientist, WireX Communications, Inc. http://wirex.com Security Hardened Linux Distribution: http://immunix.org Available for purchase: http://wirex.com/Products/Immunix/purchase.html _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Sep 23 2001 - 20:19:47 PDT