On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 04:43:16PM -0700, richard offer wrote: > > Whats technically to stop me writing a device driver that replaces the > exiting capable() code with my own implementation ? Likewise with > intercepting and replacing system calls ? capable() is an inline function call. Modify that header file, and you have to publish your changes. Replacing system calls on the fly is known to be racy and dangerous. You do that at your own risk. greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Sep 24 2001 - 16:58:26 PDT