Re: Binary only module overview

From: Greg KH (gregat_private)
Date: Mon Sep 24 2001 - 17:16:20 PDT

  • Next message: Martin Stricker: "Re: GPL only usage of security.h"

    On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 05:13:18PM -0700, richard offer wrote:
    > 
    > You're right, capable() was a bad choice, permission().
    
    permission() is in fs/namei.c.  How are you going to modify that in a
    loadable module?  You would have to modify fs/namei.c, and if you do
    that, you have to publish your changes.
    
    greg k-h
    
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Sep 24 2001 - 17:21:28 PDT