Re: Binary only module overview

From: Kurt Seifried (listuserat_private)
Date: Mon Sep 24 2001 - 19:00:24 PDT

  • Next message: Greg KH: "Re: GPL only usage of security.h"

    Something to state:
    
    Please get this sorted out and _CLEARLY_ documented. Nothing is worse then
    an ambiguous license. Look what happened with IPF ("oh, it was never open
    source, it's mine") among others. I personally think a license people don't
    like but is clearly written is better then one that people like but isn't
    clearly written. Also be careful making modifications to existing licenses
    (i.e. use a sort of gpl/lgpl/whatever) because what may seem like a sane
    change would be interpeted differently by a lawyer/court.
    
    Aaaanyways, I'm gonna crawl back into my little hole now and wait for the
    next Immunix release ;).
    
    Kurt Seifried, kurtat_private
    A15B BEE5 B391 B9AD B0EF
    AEB0 AD63 0B4E AD56 E574
    http://www.seifried.org/security/
    
    
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Sep 24 2001 - 19:02:41 PDT