Re: [Linux-security-module-commit] lsm tree change 1.220

From: Greg KH (gregat_private)
Date: Wed Sep 26 2001 - 16:41:48 PDT

  • Next message: Greg KH: "Re: Binary only module overview"

    On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 04:36:35PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
    > diff -Nru a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
    > --- a/include/linux/security.h	Wed Sep 26 16:36:41 2001
    > +++ b/include/linux/security.h	Wed Sep 26 16:36:41 2001
    > @@ -10,6 +10,12 @@
    >   *	it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
    >   *	the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
    >   *	(at your option) any later version.
    > + *
    > + *	Due to this file being licensed under the GPL there is controversy over
    > + *	whether this permits you to write a module that #includes this file
    > + *	without placing your module under the GPL.  Please consult a lawyer for
    > + *	advice before doing this.
    > + *
    >   */
    >  
    >  #ifndef __LINUX_SECURITY_H
    
    Ok, does anyone object to this wording?
    
    thanks,
    
    greg k-h
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Sep 26 2001 - 16:47:27 PDT