Re: Binary only module overview

Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: [Linux-security-module-commit] lsm tree change 1.220"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Binary only module overview"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Binary only module overview"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

gregat_private

On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 10:58:35PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> Given the SSSCA we have to be very clear on this issue, and if its not clear
> I might be best to kill the entire uncertainty by not including the LSM
> patch in Linux until the US government returns to sanity

Or place some kind of markings on the symbols/functions that the LSM
code exports stating that these symbols/functions can only be called
from GPL licensed code.

But to do that, it would require the cooperation of all of the LSM
authors :)

thanks,

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module