Re: [PATCH] proposed documentation changes

From: Chris Wright (chrisat_private)
Date: Thu Sep 27 2001 - 15:51:02 PDT

  • Next message: Greg KH: "Re: [PATCH] proposed documentation changes"

    * Greg KH (gregat_private) wrote:
    > On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 01:50:10PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
    > > 
    > > Placing the whole comments into the body of the structure definition as
    > > you had suggested to me sounds like a good idea.  I'll go try that
    > > and see what the results look like.
    > 
    > I tried it, and it didn't really work at all.
    > 
    > So I messed with things a bit more, and think I got something that looks
    > reasonably good.  Please look at:
    > 	http://lsm.immunix.org/~greg/security.html
    > and tell me what you think.
    
    Looks like a good start, but i don't think it's acceptable to drop the
    parameter information.  Also, it makes more intuitive sense to me to
    have the general structure description come before each member's
    description.  I'd also like to wait until this is in the kernel before
    we commit changes like this.  We don't need any extra patches that make
    lsm any more controversial ;-)
    
    -chris
    
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Sep 27 2001 - 15:53:32 PDT