Re: [PATCH] proposed documentation changes

From: Greg KH (gregat_private)
Date: Thu Sep 27 2001 - 15:57:20 PDT

  • Next message: Stephen Smalley: "[PATCH] Support for stacking capabilities with SELinux (Was: Re: I can ' t use named on LSM-based Prototype. Why?)"

    On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 03:51:02PM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
    > Looks like a good start, but i don't think it's acceptable to drop the
    > parameter information.
    For the more complicated function calls, I agree.  For these, I don't
    think it is needed, as the description states what needs to happen.
    > Also, it makes more intuitive sense to me to have the general
    > structure description come before each member's description.
    That is the format that the function descriptions are in right now.  If
    you don't like the structure, feel free to submit a patch to Tim :)
    > I'd also like to wait until this is in the kernel before
    > we commit changes like this.  We don't need any extra patches that make
    > lsm any more controversial ;-)
    Ok, I'll wait.
    greg k-h
    linux-security-module mailing list

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Sep 27 2001 - 16:03:28 PDT