On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 03:51:02PM -0700, Chris Wright wrote: > > Looks like a good start, but i don't think it's acceptable to drop the > parameter information. For the more complicated function calls, I agree. For these, I don't think it is needed, as the description states what needs to happen. > Also, it makes more intuitive sense to me to have the general > structure description come before each member's description. That is the format that the function descriptions are in right now. If you don't like the structure, feel free to submit a patch to Tim :) > I'd also like to wait until this is in the kernel before > we commit changes like this. We don't need any extra patches that make > lsm any more controversial ;-) Ok, I'll wait. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Sep 27 2001 - 16:03:28 PDT