Greg KH wrote: > Um, hooks that do nothing but let the module know what the kernel is > doing at a point in time, don't seem to be under the lsm charter right > now. Like David Wagner said, it smells like audit. There are a lot of hooks which are useful for audit. Are you going to take them out because of that? I would hope that the goal here is "not to do audit" as opposed to "prevent audit from being done". The fact that a hook might be useful for audit ought not poison it when it's good for other purposes as well. I would also hope that we, as a group, could be just a touch less judgemental regarding the uses others plan to put LSM to. I don't much care what policy Steven, Crispin, or Greg might want, but I do want y'all to be successful with LSM. -- Casey Schaufler Manager, Trust Technology, SGI caseyat_private voice: 650.933.1634 casey_pat_private Pager: 888.220.0607 _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Oct 02 2001 - 09:22:24 PDT