On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 03:02:51PM -0700, richard offer wrote: > > > > I'd like to see a comment on the authoritative patch I sent last week. A > > comment other than "I don't like authoritative hooks so I'm not going to > > apply it". > > I don't like it, and I'm not going to apply it :) > > Come on, we've been over this before... > Um, just for my notes: why? Authoritative where not necessary, Not necessary for object-restrictive function, too invasive for imagined consideration by the KD's+Linus, or some specified other? Not being combative, this time, just curious. J. Melvin Jones > greg k-h |>------------------------------------------------------ || J. MELVIN JONES jmjonesat_private |>------------------------------------------------------ || Microcomputer Systems Consultant || Software Developer || Web Site Design, Hosting, and Administration || Network and Systems Administration |>------------------------------------------------------ || http://www.jmjones.com/ |>------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 05 2001 - 15:39:51 PDT