Re: [RFC] 2.4.11-pre4 patch

From: jmjonesat_private
Date: Fri Oct 05 2001 - 15:37:25 PDT

  • Next message: jmjonesat_private: "Re: Making forward progress"

    On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Greg KH wrote:
    
    > On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 03:02:51PM -0700, richard offer wrote:
    > > 
    > > I'd like to see a comment on the authoritative patch I sent last week. A
    > > comment other than "I don't like authoritative hooks so I'm not going to
    > > apply it".
    > 
    > I don't like it, and I'm not going to apply it :)
    > 
    > Come on, we've been over this before...
    > 
    
    Um, just for my notes: why?  Authoritative where not necessary, Not
    necessary for object-restrictive function, too invasive for imagined
    consideration by the KD's+Linus, or some specified other?
    
    Not being combative, this time, just curious.
    J. Melvin Jones 
    
    > greg k-h
    
    
    |>------------------------------------------------------
    ||  J. MELVIN JONES            jmjonesat_private 
    |>------------------------------------------------------
    ||  Microcomputer Systems Consultant  
    ||  Software Developer
    ||  Web Site Design, Hosting, and Administration
    ||  Network and Systems Administration
    |>------------------------------------------------------
    ||  http://www.jmjones.com/
    |>------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 05 2001 - 15:39:51 PDT