* jmjonesat_private (jmjonesat_private) wrote: > > security_register() and mod_reg_security() are different, philosophically, > although they both use the verify function. > > I see a paradigm where passing a NULL pointer to mod_reg_security may > be a request "not to change" the pointer, since module families may handle > subsets. hmm, i guess this is possible. of course, a NULL pointer is the same as a useful pointer that returns a-ok. it's nice to sanity check as much as possible. how about we leave this for the time being, given the work arounds (good pointer, return 0 implementation, bad non-zero pointer)? -chris _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 26 2001 - 12:34:25 PDT