On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 03:44:29PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > Here's my latest try at converting a tiny portion of the security.h > comments to the proper kernel-doc format. This time, there can't be any > discussion that "our format is better" as it is not in proper kernel-doc > style. It turns out that my complaints last go-around about 'missing parameter information' wasn't a fundemental failing of the kernel-doc tool -- in fact, it was just the individual conversion I had issue with. :) On looking at the new documentation output by the tool, I find this format completely acceptable to me. I would like to ask that all documentation conversions retain the blunt and forward "<param x> is used for ..." style. :) -- The Bill of Rights: 7 out of 10 rights haven't been sold yet! Contact your congressman for details how *you* can buy one today! _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Oct 31 2001 - 16:02:23 PST