Re: netlink_send for dummy.c

From: James Morris (jmorrisat_private)
Date: Wed Oct 31 2001 - 18:38:03 PST

  • Next message: Stephen Smalley: "Re: netlink_send for dummy.c"

    On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Chris Wright wrote:
    
    > the current netlink_send in dummy.c actually uses capabilities.  this is
    > not the end of the world, but is a bit of a hack.
    >
    > admittedly, this is just another hack ;-)  but i'd say it's closer to
    > the dummy charter (superuser permsisions).  since we do not have a
    > blob in netlink_skb_parms (we've talked about this a few times), we can
    > steal the eff_cap for dummy's needs.
    >
    > thoughts/flames?
    >
    
    I'm don't think that we should overload the eff_cap field in this way, and
    it is still just replacing one hack with another as you mention.
    
    Non-dummy modules now need to make a policy decision about capabilities
    implementation, and potentially break encapsulation of the capabilities
    API in the process.
    
    
    - James
    -- 
    James Morris
    <jmorrisat_private>
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Oct 31 2001 - 18:39:19 PST