Re: Proposed documentation patch to security.h

Previous message: James Morris: "Re: [Linux-security-module-commit] lsm tree change 1.243"
Next in thread: Stephen Smalley: "Re: Proposed documentation patch to security.h"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

jmorrisat_private

On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Greg KH wrote:

> Let me know if anyone has any problems with this.  And if so,
> constructive counter proposals are encouraged :)

Looks fine to me.

> p.s. yes, I know I deleted the "called:" comments, as these are pretty
> useless for anyone with 'grep' or 'cscope' or 'lxr' and are already
> start to fall out of sync with the rest of the kernel tree.
>

I don't have a problem with this, or removing the locking information,
which is particularly bad if it's wrong.

- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorrisat_private>

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module