On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Greg KH wrote: > I don't like the locking information, as it too will quickly go out of > date. I'd rather just refer people to the kernel locking document that > someone at IBM is keeping, which details the placement of all kernel > locks. > > Module developers are going to have to be very aware of this, as the > locks have a tendency to disappear over time :) > > What do other people think? Well, it is important for security module writer's to know about locks that are held across hook calls. So at the very least, let's ensure that this is mentioned in the lsm.tmpl document, possibly as part of Emily's proposed security module writer guidelines. -- Stephen D. Smalley, NAI Labs ssmalley@nai.com _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-module@wirex.com http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Nov 01 2001 - 06:52:25 PST