On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Greg KH wrote: > Problem with your patch is that the super_block is empty of any > information that the security module previously thought it had access > to. This change is fine with me, but people who have to maintain LSM > modules might not like it :) > > Any other opinions? I think that this is ok - the super_block alloc_security hook should just allocate the security blob and not be dependent on having any specific information about the super_block, like most of the other alloc_security hooks. The check_sb hook and post_addmount hooks can be used by the security module to perform access control and update state based on more information. -- Stephen D. Smalley, NAI Labs ssmalleyat_private _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Dec 17 2001 - 11:23:19 PST