Re: [RFC][PATCH] super block [alloc|free]_security

From: Greg KH (gregat_private)
Date: Mon Dec 17 2001 - 08:27:17 PST

  • Next message: Chris Wright: "Re: [Linux-security-module-commit] lsm 2.5 tree change 1.2.1.19 1.2.1.20 1.2.1.21 1.2.1.22 1.2.1.23 1.2.1.24 1.2.1.25 1.2.1.26 1.2.1.27 1.2.1.28 1.2.1.29 1.2.1.30 1.294 1.295 1.296 1.297 1.298 1.299 1.300 1.2.1.31 1.301 1.302" 

    On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 02:31:45AM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> as i mentioned in the merge mail...here is the beginning of a patch to
> move the super block [alloc|free]_security stuff around.  the patch is
> against 2.5.1-lsm (which, btw, i'm running right now, and with the
> signal patch reverted can even reboot cleanly ;-)
> 
> comments?

Problem with your patch is that the super_block is empty of any
information that the security module previously thought it had access
to.  This change is fine with me, but people who have to maintain LSM
modules might not like it :)

Any other opinions?

thanks,

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Dec 17 2001 - 08:31:16 PST