Re: [RFC][PATCH] super block [alloc|free]_security

Previous message: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] super block [alloc|free]_security"
In reply to: Chris Wright: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] super block [alloc|free]_security"
Next in thread: Serge E. Hallyn: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] super block [alloc|free]_security"
Reply: Serge E. Hallyn: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] super block [alloc|free]_security"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

sdsat_private

On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Chris Wright wrote:

> same patch for lsm-2.4.  currently lsm-2.4 appears to miss the mount cases for
> get_sb_bdev() (normal block device) and get_sb_single() (single sb, like
> /proc, devfs, etc), since they have moved to calling fs_type->read_super()
> directly.
>
> comments?

Looks fine.  SELinux just allocates the security blob on the first
attempted use anyway (via its precondition functions) if it wasn't caught
by an alloc_security hook.

--
Stephen D. Smalley, NAI Labs
ssmalleyat_private

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module