Re: 2.5 and mount MS_MOVE

Previous message: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] super block [alloc|free]_security"
In reply to: Chris Wright: "2.5 and mount MS_MOVE"
Next in thread: Serge E. Hallyn: "Re: 2.5 and mount MS_MOVE"
Reply: Serge E. Hallyn: "Re: 2.5 and mount MS_MOVE"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

sdsat_private

On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Chris Wright wrote:

> moving the check_sb() and post_add_mount() hooks into graft_tree() ought
> to do it.  and check_sb() would have to notice if sb->s_security had
> already been initialized.

This seems reasonable for generality, although I'm not sure that any of
the existing security modules actually need these hooks to be called for
bind or move mounts.

--
Stephen D. Smalley, NAI Labs
ssmalleyat_private

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module