Re: 2.5 and mount MS_MOVE

From: Serge E. Hallyn (hallynat_private)
Date: Wed Dec 19 2001 - 12:21:42 PST

  • Next message: Greg KH: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] super block [alloc|free]_security"

    DTE would not act on a move.  However, I seem to remember a project being
    discussed (was it SubDomain?) which was based purely on pathnames.  They
    would probably want to know about this.
    
    -serge
    
    Quoting Stephen Smalley (sdsat_private):
    > 
    > On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Chris Wright wrote:
    > 
    > > moving the check_sb() and post_add_mount() hooks into graft_tree() ought
    > > to do it.  and check_sb() would have to notice if sb->s_security had
    > > already been initialized.
    > 
    > This seems reasonable for generality, although I'm not sure that any of
    > the existing security modules actually need these hooks to be called for
    > bind or move mounts.
    > 
    > --
    > Stephen D. Smalley, NAI Labs
    > ssmalleyat_private
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > _______________________________________________
    > linux-security-module mailing list
    > linux-security-moduleat_private
    > http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Dec 19 2001 - 12:22:21 PST