Re: Legitimate Question

From: jmjonesat_private
Date: Thu Jan 24 2002 - 13:25:26 PST

  • Next message: Seth Arnold: "Re: Legitimate Question"

    On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Stephen Smalley wrote:
    
    > 
    > 
    > On Thu, 24 Jan 2002 jmjonesat_private wrote:
    > 
    > > Wouldn't it be useful for a userspace application that is
    > > setuid root to be able to bypass the module's checks.
    > 
    > Useful for people who want to break into your systems, yes.  One of the
    > problems with existing Unix systems is that you only need to find a single
    > setuid root program or root daemon that has a flaw, and you can take
    > control of the entire system.
    
    Um, respectfully, I might disagree.  What I'm looking for is a way to
    install a product on the system that works, rather than a way to bypass
    security.  Perhaps a small application that ASKS for such a access, or 
    a way for the install code to similarly ask and answer.  If this is 
    well beyond the concept of "security", I understand, but this is the way
    that INSTALL scripts have worked in the pass.  I'm looking for a new way
    to do the same thing.
    
    Sincerely,
    J. Melvin Jones
    
    |>------------------------------------------------------
    ||  J. MELVIN JONES            jmjonesat_private 
    |>------------------------------------------------------
    ||  Microcomputer Systems Consultant  
    ||  Software Developer
    ||  Web Site Design, Hosting, and Administration
    ||  Network and Systems Administration
    |>------------------------------------------------------
    ||  http://www.jmjones.com/
    |>------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jan 24 2002 - 13:26:30 PST