> > Now, LIDS use a new version number for now it can compile under both 2.4 > > and 2.5 . The new version number is "1.0.0pre1" for this first release, > > and I will release the final "1.0.0" after it get stable. Actually, > > during these days using, it is quite stable now. > > May I suggest to keep 2.x.x version numbers. > That's *very* bad to have two different versions with the same version > number! I was scratching my head at the 1.x choice too. 2.x make much more sense. It's a completely different method of interacting with the kernel (LSM), and as such it more than deserves it's own major number. -- Brian Hatch I feel like I have a Systems and tumor growing inside me. Security Engineer You mean the one with a http://www.ifokr.org/bri/ heartbeat? Yeah, that one. Every message PGP signed
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Mar 06 2002 - 21:47:50 PST