On Wed, 20 Mar 2002 00:38, Seth Arnold wrote: > On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 05:49:21PM -0500, I.P. Park wrote: > > 1. What is the state of LSM's approval in the Linux kernel community ? > > Will there be a decision-making meeting sometime soon? > > As far as I can tell, reaction to LSM in the kernel community is mixed. > Some are in favor of it. Others are opposed to it. As usual, there are a > variety of reasons for both viewpoints. > > As for decision-making meetings, the closest thing I can think of might > be at OLS[1] -- but, as usual in the Linux community, I'd be surprised > if it were terribly formal, or even carry significant weight. Why do you think OLS? Also who here is going to OLS? Is anyone else from this list giving a talk? -- If you send email to me or to a mailing list that I use which has >4 lines of legalistic junk at the end then you are specifically authorizing me to do whatever I wish with the message and all other messages from your domain, by posting the message you agree that your long legalistic sig is void. _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Mar 19 2002 - 16:37:46 PST