On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 03:45:44PM -0500, jmjonesat_private wrote: > > Has anybody written a paper, or a list, or a set of notes that respond to > the following question, yet? > > " > Since secure-systems are a minority of installed systems, and the LSM code > works exceptionally well with a common-patch, why should this patch enter > into the "official" code tree for Linux and not simply track it as a > shared resource for secure-system developers, developed outside the 'stock > kernel' tree? > " "Because Linus said he would accept such a patch." greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Mar 22 2002 - 13:08:17 PST